Opel Omega 1994 vs Audi A6 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 20 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1160 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 1 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Opel Omega has 21 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Audi A6 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Audi A6 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Audi A6 has
| |