Opel Omega 1994 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 65 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 61 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.4 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 47 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 13 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 1360 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Opel Omega uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Toledo (by 530 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.5 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`010 kg | 1`495 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`551 kg | 985 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 459 kg | 510 kg | |
| Opel Omega load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Seat Toledo. Therefore, Seat Toledo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Opel Omega has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |