Opel Omega 1999 vs Toyota Camry 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 273 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Camry is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 25 HP more power than Toyota Camry, but torque is 3 NM less than Toyota Camry. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 13.3 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Omega consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Camry) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Camry engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Sintra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Omega engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
| Opel Omega is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Camry, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |