Opel Omega 2000 vs Toyota Camry 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 231 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Camry is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota Camry, but torque is 9 NM more than Toyota Camry. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.3 | |
|
The Toyota Camry is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Camry) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 127 mm (5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Omega can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Omega version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Toyota Camry 2017 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota Camry 2017 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Opel Omega is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Camry, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 493 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 37 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`180 kg | 2`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`610 kg | 1`555 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 570 kg | 475 kg | |
| Opel Omega load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Toyota Camry. Therefore, Opel Omega is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |