Opel Omega 2000 vs Opel Omega 1994

 
Opel Omega
2000 - 2003
Opel Omega
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.6 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP170 HP
Torque: 240 NM227 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds9.5 seconds
Opel Omega 2000 engine produces 10 HP more power than Opel Omega 1994, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Opel Omega 1994.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.69.1
Real fuel consumption: 10.5 l/100km10.2 l/100km
By specification Opel Omega 2000 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega 1994, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega 2000 could require 225 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega 2000 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega 1994.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway900 km on highway
710 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 140 mm (5.5 inches)140 mm (5.5 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.79 m
Width: 1.78 m1.79 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Opel Omega 2000 is 11 cm longer than the Opel Omega 1994, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres530 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litres830 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1802`120
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Opel Omega 2000 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega 1994 has serious deffects in 1395 percent more cases than Opel Omega 2000, so Opel Omega 2000 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1200800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Opel Omega has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv