Opel Omega 2000 vs Opel Omega 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 227 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Opel Omega 2000 engine produces 10 HP more power than Opel Omega 1994, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Opel Omega 1994. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
By specification Opel Omega 2000 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega 1994, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega 2000 could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega 2000 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega 1994. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
710 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.90 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Opel Omega 2000 is 11 cm longer than the Opel Omega 1994, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 830 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 2`120 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Opel Omega 2000 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega 1994 has serious deffects in 1395 percent more cases than Opel Omega 2000, so Opel Omega 2000 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Opel Omega has
| |