Opel Omega 1999 vs BMW 3 series 2001

 
Opel Omega
1999 - 2001
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP184 HP
Torque: 250 NM390 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds8.2 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 54 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 140 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.08.0
Real fuel consumption: 9.5 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1010 km on highway
780 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.47 m
Width: 1.78 m1.74 m
Height: 1.46 m1.42 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 43 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 90 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1702`035
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Opel Omega has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12002400
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv