Opel Omega 1999 vs BMW 5 series 2000

 
Opel Omega
1999 - 2003
BMW 5 series
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 144 HP231 HP
Torque: 203 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds7.6 seconds
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 87 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 97 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.611.0
Real fuel consumption: 9.6 l/100km11.1 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway880 km on highway
780 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
BMW 5 sērija 2000 3.0 engine: The BMW M54B30 is a 3.0-liter naturally aspirated inline-six producing about 231 hp, produced between 2000 and 2006. It is widely regarded as one of BMW’s more successful engines of that era, known for smooth operation and strong performance. With proper maintenance, these engines often ...  More about BMW 5 sērija 2000 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.78 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Opel Omega is 12 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
830 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight: 2`080 kg2`100 kg
Net weight:1`535 kg1`540 kg
Load capacity:545 kg560 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:Opel Omega has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 5 series has serious deffects in 440 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14002400
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv