Opel Omega 1999 vs Toyota Avensis 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Avensis is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 6 HP less power than Toyota Avensis, but torque is 3 NM more than Toyota Avensis. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Avensis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Avensis) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Toyota Avensis 2000 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota Avensis 2000 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 38 cm longer than the Toyota Avensis, 7 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Avensis. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Opel Omega has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Avensis has serious deffects in 255 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Toyota Avensis has
| |