Opel Omega 1999 vs Peugeot 607 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 607 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 66 HP less power than Peugeot 607, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Peugeot 607. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.8 | |
| Opel Omega consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 607, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 607) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Opel Omega is 3 cm longer than the Peugeot 607, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 49 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 607. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 607, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Peugeot 607 has
| |