Opel Omega 1999 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 59 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 59 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.39 m | |
| Opel Omega is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler Sebring, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 75 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |