Opel Omega 2000 vs Opel Omega 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Opel Omega 1994 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega 2000 engine produces 10 HP less power than Opel Omega 1994, but torque is 30 NM more than Opel Omega 1994. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
The Opel Omega 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega 2000 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega 1994, which means that by driving the Opel Omega 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega 2000 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega 1994. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
1330 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
1050 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Omega 2000 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Omega 2000 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.90 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Opel Omega 2000 is 11 cm longer than the Opel Omega 1994, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 830 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`145 | 2`170 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Opel Omega 2000 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega 1994 has serious deffects in 1395 percent more cases than Opel Omega 2000, so Opel Omega 2000 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Opel Omega has
| |