Opel Omega 2000 vs BMW 5 series 2000

 
Opel Omega
2000 - 2003
BMW 5 series
2000 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 120 HP136 HP
Torque: 280 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds11 seconds
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 16 HP less power than BMW 5 series, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.15.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1180 km in combined cycle
1330 km on highway1480 km on highway
1050 km with real consumption1110 km with real consumption
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 5 series engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Frontera, Opel SintraUsed also on BMW 3 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.78 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Opel Omega is 12 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1452`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
BMW 5 series has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so BMW 5 series quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12005200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv