Opel Omega 2000 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Diesel (Opel Omega) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda Xedos 9) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 146 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 180 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Mazda Xedos 9 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 26 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 9, but torque is 100 NM more than Mazda Xedos 9. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 9.0 | |
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
1330 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda Xedos 9) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Frontera, Opel Sintra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 6 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 9 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.90 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.40 m | |
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 8 cm longer than the Mazda Xedos 9, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`145 | 1`940 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |