Opel Omega 2000 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1998

 
Opel Omega
2000 - 2003
Mazda Xedos 9
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Diesel (Opel Omega) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda Xedos 9) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 120 HP146 HP
Torque: 280 NM180 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds10.7 seconds
Mazda Xedos 9 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 26 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 9, but torque is 100 NM more than Mazda Xedos 9. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.19.0
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
1330 km on highway970 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda Xedos 9) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 4 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Frontera, Opel SintraInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 6
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 9 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.82 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.46 m1.40 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 8 cm longer than the Mazda Xedos 9, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1451`940
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 1200800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Mazda Xedos 9 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv