Opel Omega 2000 vs BMW 3 series 2001

 
Opel Omega
2000 - 2003
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 120 HP115 HP
Torque: 280 NM265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds11 seconds
Opel Omega engine produces 5 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 15 NM more than BMW 3 series. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.15.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 225 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1330 km on highway1400 km on highway
1050 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Frontera, Opel SintraUsed also on BMW 5 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.47 m
Width: 1.78 m1.74 m
Height: 1.46 m1.42 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 43 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 90 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1451`895
Safety: no data
Quality:Opel Omega has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 435 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv