Opel Omega 1991 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 4 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.0 | |
| Opel Omega consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
| Opel Omega is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 2125 litres | |
|
Volvo 960 has more luggage space. Opel Omega has 467 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |