Opel Omega 1991 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 228 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Opel Omega engine produces 54 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Ford Scorpio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.7 | |
| Opel Omega consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 3 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |