Opel Omega 1989 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 228 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Opel Omega engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 10.7 | |
| Opel Omega consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 3 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Scorpio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford Scorpio, so Ford Scorpio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |