Opel Omega 1989 vs Mercedes E class 1989

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1992
Mercedes E class
1989 - 1992
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 177 HP180 HP
Torque: 240 NM255 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds8.4 seconds
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 3 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.811.4
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres72 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.76 m
Width: 1.77 m1.74 m
Height: 1.48 m1.49 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 525 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1855 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

high
Mercedes E class has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 30002400
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mercedes E klase has
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv