Opel Omega 1990 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Opel Omega engine produces 25 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.3 | |
| Opel Omega consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 3 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |