Opel Omega 1990 vs Volvo 940 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Opel Omega engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo 940, but torque is 17 NM more than Volvo 940. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
| Opel Omega is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 2125 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage space. Opel Omega has 472 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 940 (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo 940 has
| |