Opel Omega 1990 vs Volvo 940 1990

 
Opel Omega
1990 - 1994
Volvo 940
1990 - 1992
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.6 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP155 HP
Torque: 220 NM203 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds10.5 seconds
Opel Omega engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo 940, but torque is 17 NM more than Volvo 940.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.610.1
Opel Omega consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway820 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.81 m
Width: 1.77 m1.75 m
Height: 1.48 m1.44 m
Opel Omega is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres992 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1855 litres2125 litres
Volvo 940 has more luggage space.
Opel Omega has 472 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 940 (by 270 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0801`975
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

above average
Volvo 940 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 26002000
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volvo 940 has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv