Opel Omega 1989 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Opel Omega engine produces 65 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 11.2 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
| Opel Omega is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 2125 litres | |
|
Volvo 960 has more luggage space. Opel Omega has 472 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |