Opel Omega 1989 vs Volvo 960 1990

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Volvo 960
1990 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 125 HP190 HP
Torque: 195 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 secondsn/a seconds
Opel Omega engine produces 65 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Volvo 960.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.611.2
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway880 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.85 m
Width: 1.77 m1.75 m
Height: 1.48 m1.44 m
Opel Omega is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres992 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1855 litres2125 litres
Volvo 960 has more luggage space.
Opel Omega has 472 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 270 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`950no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 26003000
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volvo 960 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv