Opel Omega 1989 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 201 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.5 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 19 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.1 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 3 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |