Opel Omega 1989 vs Volvo 940 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.5 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 9 HP less power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Volvo 940. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.6 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
| Opel Omega is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 2125 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage space. Opel Omega has 467 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 940 (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |