Opel Omega 1989 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.1 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 3 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Opel Omega has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Scorpio, so Opel Omega quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |