Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 100 1988

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Audi 100
1988 - 1991
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP116 HP
Torque: 170 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds10.9 seconds
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 1 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.29.1
Real fuel consumption: 9.4 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
740 km with real consumption900 km with real consumption
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.79 m
Width: 1.77 m1.81 m
Height: 1.48 m1.42 m
Opel Omega is smaller, but higher.
Opel Omega is 2 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 525 litres644 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1855 litres1920 litres
Audi 100 has more luggage space.
Opel Omega has 119 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi 100 (by 65 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`840
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 26001400
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv