Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 100 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 14 HP more power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Audi 100. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Frontera, Opel Calibra | Used also on Audi A6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Omega might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Opel Omega is smaller, but slightly higher. Opel Omega is 2 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 1310 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Omega has 135 litres more trunk space than the Audi 100. The Audi 100 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 545 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Audi 100 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 100, so Audi 100 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Audi 100 has
| |