Opel Omega 1989 vs Volvo 940 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 3 HP more power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Volvo 940. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
| Opel Omega is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 2125 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage space. Opel Omega has 467 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 940 (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |