Opel Omega 1994 vs Audi A6 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Opel Omega engine produces 37 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Audi A6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Omega consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Sintra | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi 80, Audi 100, Audi Coupe | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi A6 1994 2.8 engine: This engine, especially at higher mileages, often tends to consume oil, and the timing belt change interval in particular should be observed. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 2 cm longer than the Audi A6, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 150 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Audi A6 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Audi A6 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Audi A6 has
| |