Opel Omega 1994 vs Volvo V90 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Opel Omega engine produces 31 HP more power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volvo V90. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 11.0 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Opel Omega is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1702 litres | |
| Opel Omega has 452 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V90, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |