Opel Omega 1994 vs Volvo V90 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 50 HP less power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volvo V90. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 11.7 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Opel Omega is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1702 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V90, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |