Opel Omega 1994 vs Volkswagen Golf 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volkswagen Golf 1993 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Volkswagen Golf 1993 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 48 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 9 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 466 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1426 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 74 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 374 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |