Opel Omega 1994 vs Audi 80 1992

 
Opel Omega
1994 - 1997
Audi 80
1992 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP90 HP
Torque: 250 NM202 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds14 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 40 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.75.5
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 330 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 970 km in combined cycle1200 km in combined cycle
1170 km on highway1600 km on highway
900 km with real consumption1150 km with real consumption
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.48 m
Width: 1.79 m1.70 m
Height: 1.50 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 34 cm longer than the Audi 80, 9 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres1200 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 170 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 600 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2801`860
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Audi 80 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Audi 80 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv