Opel Omega 1994 vs Audi 100 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 15 HP more power than Audi 100, but torque is 15 NM less than Audi 100. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1190 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi 100 1991 2.5 engine: Very reliable engine if not overheated. Occasionally, the high pressure fuel pump can cause problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 3 cm longer than the Audi 100, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1310 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 150 litres more trunk space than the Audi 100. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`025 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Opel Omega has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 100 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Audi 100 has
| |