Opel Omega 1994 vs Ford Scorpio 1994
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
Opel Omega and Ford Scorpio have the same engine power, but Opel Omega torque is 10 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
760 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Vectra, Opel Calibra | Used also on Ford Mondeo | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Omega might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
Opel Omega is smaller, but higher. Opel Omega is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |