Opel Omega 1994 vs Ford Scorpio 1994

 
Opel Omega
1994 - 1997
Ford Scorpio
1994 - 1996
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 136 HP136 HP
Torque: 185 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.5 seconds13.3 seconds
Opel Omega and Ford Scorpio have the same engine power, but Opel Omega torque is 10 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.89.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.8 l/100km10.7 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
760 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Vectra, Opel CalibraUsed also on Ford Mondeo
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Omega might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.83 m
Width: 1.79 m1.87 m
Height: 1.50 m1.44 m
Opel Omega is smaller, but higher.
Opel Omega is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1252`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Ford Scorpio has
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv