Opel Omega 1995 vs Volkswagen Golf 1993

 
Opel Omega
1995 - 1997
Volkswagen Golf
1993 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 116 HP90 HP
Torque: 175 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds12.8 seconds
Opel Omega engine produces 26 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.28.1
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 165 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway950 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years8 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Vento, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.34 m
Width: 1.79 m1.70 m
Height: 1.50 m1.43 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 48 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 9 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres466 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres1425 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 74 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 375 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0101`650
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv