Opel Omega 1995 vs Ford Scorpio 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Opel Omega engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.1 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Opel Omega is smaller, but higher. Opel Omega is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |