Opel Omega 1995 vs Audi 80 1992

 
Opel Omega
1995 - 1997
Audi 80
1992 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 116 HP90 HP
Torque: 175 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds14.1 seconds
Opel Omega engine produces 26 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.28.8
Opel Omega consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway970 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km500'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years5 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.48 m
Width: 1.79 m1.70 m
Height: 1.50 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 34 cm longer than the Audi 80, 9 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres1200 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 170 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 600 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0101`780
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Audi 80 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Audi 80 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv