Opel Omega 1995 vs Skoda Felicia 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 94 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 19 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive. Opel Omega engine produces 62 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 81 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.1 | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Felicia) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 62 cm longer than the Skoda Felicia, 15 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`010 kg | 900 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Opel Omega has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |