Opel Omega 1997 vs SAAB 9-5 1997
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 39 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 30 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 10.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 9-5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Opel Omega is 2 cm longer than the SAAB 9-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.2 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| SAAB 9-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 195 percent more cases than SAAB 9-5, so SAAB 9-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |