Opel Omega 1997 vs Subaru Outback 1998

 
Opel Omega
1997 - 1999
Subaru Outback
1998 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP209 HP
Torque: 175 NM282 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds8.9 seconds
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 93 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 107 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.010.5
Opel Omega consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway820 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.72 m
Width: 1.79 m1.74 m
Height: 1.50 m1.58 m
Opel Omega is larger, but lower.
Opel Omega is 10 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 5 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres527 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres1649 litres
Opel Omega has 13 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Outback. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 151 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`0102`085
Safety: no data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Subaru Outback has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv