Opel Omega 1997 vs BMW 5 series 1995

 
Opel Omega
1997 - 1999
BMW 5 series
1995 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 116 HP150 HP
Torque: 175 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds11 seconds
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 15 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.09.6
Opel Omega consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway970 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years7 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW Z3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.80 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.50 m1.44 m
Opel Omega is 2 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres1525 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 130 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 275 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0102`195
Safety:
Quality:
below average

below average
BMW 5 series has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so BMW 5 series quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10005200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv