Opel Omega 1997 vs Audi A6 1998

 
Opel Omega
1997 - 1999
Audi A6
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 116 HP165 HP
Torque: 175 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds10.7 seconds
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 49 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.010.8
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway900 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years3 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on Audi A4
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A6 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.80 m
Width: 1.79 m1.81 m
Height: 1.50 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 2 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 85 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0102`135
Safety:
Quality:
below average

below average
Opel Omega has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A6, so Opel Omega quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001400
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Audi A6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv