Opel Omega 1997 vs Nissan Primera 1998

 
Opel Omega
1997 - 1999
Nissan Primera
1998 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 100 HP90 HP
Torque: 205 NM177 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.5 seconds14.6 seconds
Opel Omega engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Primera, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Nissan Primera. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.26.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.7 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Nissan Primera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primera.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1040 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1050 km on highway
970 km with real consumption840 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Nissan Primera) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km320'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 3 years11 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel VectraUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Opel Omega engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.58 m
Width: 1.79 m1.72 m
Height: 1.50 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 24 cm longer than the Nissan Primera, 7 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres1650 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 110 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Primera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 150 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2651`820
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Nissan Primera has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Primera, so Nissan Primera quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Nissan Primera has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv