Opel Omega 1999 vs Volvo V70 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 93 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 171 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 11.4 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Omega consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.54 m | |
| Opel Omega is 8 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1800 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Opel Omega uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`280 kg | 2`410 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |