Opel Omega 2000 vs Volvo V90 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega and Volvo V90 have the same engine power, but Opel Omega torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V90. Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 11.0 | |
| Opel Omega consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V90, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 602 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1702 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Opel Omega has 62 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. This could mean that the Opel Omega uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V90, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |