Opel Omega 1999 vs Volvo 960 1994

 
Opel Omega
1999 - 2000
Volvo 960
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 170 HP170 HP
Torque: 227 NM233 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds9.9 seconds
Opel Omega and Volvo 960 have the same engine power, but Opel Omega torque is 6 NM less than Volvo 960. Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.510.6
Real fuel consumption: 10.5 l/100km11.3 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
710 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.86 m
Width: 1.78 m1.75 m
Height: 1.50 m1.46 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 4 cm longer than the Volvo 960, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres992 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres2125 litres
Volvo 960 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Opel Omega has 452 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. This could mean that the Opel Omega uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 325 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1.2 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2802`060
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 12002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volvo 960 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv