Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 51 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
9.2
6.2
Real fuel consumption:
9.5 l/100km
7.9 l/100km
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70.
Fuel tank capacity:
75 litres
70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
810 km in combined cycle
1120 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway
1400 km on highway
780 km with real consumption
880 km with real consumption
Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Drive type
Wheel drive type:
Rear wheel drive (RWD)
All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Dimensions
Length:
4.90 m
4.82 m
Width:
1.78 m
1.86 m
Height:
1.50 m
1.54 m
Opel Omega is 8 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:
540 litres
575 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down
1800 litres
no data
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Omega has 35 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Opel Omega uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter:
11 meters
11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):
2`280
2`360
Safety:
no data
Quality:
Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better