Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 31 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
8.7
6.2
Real fuel consumption:
8.5 l/100km
7.9 l/100km
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70.
Fuel tank capacity:
75 litres
70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
860 km in combined cycle
1120 km in combined cycle
1100 km on highway
1400 km on highway
880 km with real consumption
880 km with real consumption
Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Drive type
Wheel drive type:
Rear wheel drive (RWD)
All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Dimensions
Length:
4.90 m
4.82 m
Width:
1.78 m
1.86 m
Height:
1.50 m
1.54 m
Opel Omega is 8 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:
540 litres
575 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down
1800 litres
no data
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Omega has 35 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Opel Omega uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter:
11 meters
11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):
2`300
2`360
Safety:
no data
Quality:
Opel Omega has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better
