Opel Omega 2001 vs Volvo 960 1994

 
Opel Omega
2001 - 2003
Volvo 960
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP170 HP
Torque: 300 NM233 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds10.3 seconds
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 20 HP less power than Volvo 960, but torque is 67 NM more than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.710.8
Real fuel consumption: 8.5 l/100km12.3 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
880 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.86 m
Width: 1.78 m1.75 m
Height: 1.50 m1.46 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 4 cm longer than the Volvo 960, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres992 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres2125 litres
Volvo 960 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Opel Omega has 452 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. This could mean that the Opel Omega uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 325 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1.2 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3002`060
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 12002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Volvo 960 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv